Our take on "Fed Said to Criticize Banks on Risk Models in Stress Test – Bloomberg"

Part of the stress test now involves capital planning where bank boards are asked to determine how much cash they can afford to use for stock buybacks or pay to shareholders in dividends in the future while staying above regulatory minimum capital requirements in a severe recession.

via Fed Said to Criticize Banks on Risk Models in Stress Test – Bloomberg.

The stress testing of the major banks is a good idea in the absence of nationalization of insolvent banks. However, how long will people remember? It wasn't that long ago that the hubris of certain bankers was such that they were insisting that the mistakes of the Great Depression could not be repeated. We all remember Alan Greenspan admitting that he was taken completely by surprise by the Great Recession. His fundamentals failed miserably.

The private-sector's real estate industry requires stability for maximum gains for the whole nation. It requires a sound banking system. Let us hope that the Federal Reserve's moves are not mushy. Let us hope that the Fed can unwind all of the toxic assets it's still holding after having taken them as collateral on loans to the banks and Fannie and Freddie, etc. Of course, Fannie and Freddie, even though they were poorly managed, did keep to a higher standard of due-diligence than did the average Wall Street investment bank. If real estate values rise across-the-board, the Fed will be holding much real value again.

If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.