Superrich, cash-rich buyers bought "shovel-ready" distressed land for a few dimes on the dollar. They are now beginning to cash in. However, there is this:
Investors and real estate analysts do caution that a full-blown housing recovery is still some time off.
"The housing market is getting better but we're not quite there yet," said Stephen Malpezzi, an economist at housing data company Zillow and a professor at the University of Wisconsin's Department of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics. "We all get excited when we see a few months of positive numbers, but we are still in the middle" of a fragile period for the housing sector, he said.
This post is a little heavier on the editorial side than usual:
Note the term "fragile" in the block quote above. If, for instance, all of the Shadow Inventory (real estate where owners have lost it to the banks, etc., or are losing it or likely to) comes on the market too quickly, steady price/value increases will be destabilized and tumble. Even with lower prices, many people of fairly average incomes and net worths would still not necessarily be able to come up with adequate down payments to absorb the new, real inventory any time soon (perhaps 4 to 6 years or even longer).
The Fed's mandate is not to protect the average person but the commercial-banking system. However, the Fed's mandate is also to create jobs without stimulating unmanageable inflation. Americans need good jobs to be able to afford to absorb the housing inventory that is already on the market and that will come to the market from the Shadow Inventory and new construction. Multi-family construction adds to the pressure on the existing and shadow inventories. The trend of the young to prefer renting is another factor.
As a nation, we either wait many, many years for the recovery to trickle in or we figure out how to write it off equitably. The problem with the latter is that stockholders of the various mega-banks would have to take the hit that everyone else has already taken. Those investors have a great deal of clout in Congress and the White House, etc. In addition, not all of those investors were aware of exactly what various Wall Street investment banks were up to funding every no-doc loan in Orange County and then the whole US. That's why we said "equitably" above. Even those investors who would have done the maximum due-diligence would not have understood what the Quants on Wall Street were masking. Nevertheless, the idea that all Americans should shared the pain was ethically correct in our view and it's still not too late to turn in that direction.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.