This is the big story over the last two days. Ben Bernanke's Fed is going to be purchasing an additional $45 billion per month over and above QE3's $40 billion per month in Mortgage-Backed Securities and also on an open-ended basis while targeting unemployment balanced against inflation both at named levels. This will be done while keeping the Fed's overnight, interbank interest rate (Fed funds rate) at near zero-bound.
The Fed adopted a three-part test for interest rates. Rates will stay low “at least as long” as the jobless rate remains above 6.5 percent; inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than 2.5 percent…
The Fed’s vote is a victory for the bank’s leading dove, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans, who has been pushing for numerical targets since last year. In a landmark speech in September 2011 he said inflation hawks “would be acting as if their hair was on fire” if inflation got too high. “We should be similarly energized about improving conditions in the labor market,” he said. Bernanke, for one, seems to have his hair on fire. He told reporters that high unemployment is “an enormous waste of human and economic potential.”
Read the whole article (opens in a new tab so you may easily comment here): Why the Doves Rule at Bernankes Fed – Businessweek.
The main arguments against this are 1) that low interest rates hurt fixed-income investors in interest-earning time deposits such as Certificates of Deposit and 2) that the Fed may not be able to unwind all of its Mortgage-Backed Securities purchases in a timely fashion if at all.
We shall have to wait to see who proves the more prescient. It appears though that Ben Bernanke was not prepared to wait for the US Congress to "work out" the fiscal issues. If they do a job that will be good enough for Ben, he can always back off on any of his various QE's.
Here's a fairly thorough overview:
The new program comes as a replacement for Operation Twist, in which the Fed exchanges $45 billion in short-term bonds for longer-term bonds each month. That program ends this month.
The following is from the Fed itself:
The Committee also will purchase longer-term Treasury securities after its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of Treasury securities is completed at the end of the year, initially at a pace of $45 billion per month.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.