Apartment Landlord Bans Marijuana, Sort Of

As state laws change around the country concerning marijuana usage, including for what is called medical-marijuana, it will behoove resident and multi-family landlords and managers to stay abreast of how the courts interpret those laws and seek to have them enforced.

Pursuant to that advice, here's an interesting article from the State of Washington, where marijuana laws were recently altered but the dust is yet far from settled. In fact, it appears to just be stirring up.

A tidbit:

Alexander Aversano taking marijuana tincture

A Mercer Island landlord is trying to ban marijuana in a tony apartment building, raising questions about what's allowed under Washington's medical-marijuana law and new legal-pot law.
At least one tenant, medical-marijuana patient Alex Aversano — who uses a liquid form of pot for pain relief — balked. That's led the company to backpedal. On Thursday, Abode said its intention is to ban smoking of any substances. …. A company spokeswoman left the matter of liquid or edible marijuana cloudy.

It will be interesting to see what our insurance carriers do concerning all of this. Smoking is a subject of insurance policies, so stay tuned.

Read the whole article (opens in a new tab so you may easily comment here): Mercer Island landlord tries to ban pot in apartment building | Local News | The Seattle Times.

If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.