4 Current Myths About the Real Estate Market?

In its article, 4 Current Myths About the Real Estate Market, ALO Real Estate's writer Graham Wood lists out what he calls, per the title of his piece, myths. Well, lets look at those.

1. Real estate is still a great long-term investment.

Graham is referring to owning one's own home rather than real estate, per se. We think the difference matters enough to clarify. Real estate as income property properly acquired and managed certainly has proven to be a great long-tern investment.

2. People are giving up on the suburbs.

We never saw that allegation as applied to all or even most people. The point of those who surveyed the youngest adults was to point out the opening for building more core apartments. We saw plenty of warnings against oversaturation as a longer-term possibility. Real estate developers appear, so far, not to be overbuilding. Also, as far as we could gather, they weren't saying that young adults would live in the core of larger cities regardless of the lack of vacancies. Finally on this "myth," if other costs such as transportation wouldn't wipe out the savings, cheap enough rents in the suburbs would logically attract those who would otherwise culturally prefer to live closer to downtown.

3. We're seeing a permanent shift to renting.

There were plenty of people who were burned by foreclosures, etc., who said they were swearing off homeownership. The point of most authors was that historically, the impact of the Great Depression stayed with many people for decades. Perhaps the attention span will generally be shorter concerning the Great Recession. That wouldn't surprise us. The idea that only an insignificant number of people will shy away from homeownership due to the real estate-housing-crash nevertheless strikes us as premature, with or without survey responses.

Here's an article with a different spin on the survey results: Survey unveils families desire to rent versus own.

4. Buying is again better than renting.

The only articles we saw spoke in terms of location. We didn't see anyone making the statement concerning the whole country.

We think people, publishers, and different real-estate sectors are speaking at cross-purposes for marketing purposes whether they each realize it or not.

The home builders and agents have a vested interest in psychological signals boosting single-family-home ownership. The all-cash buyers aren't going to keep it up at their current pace forever. Large, multi-family high rise developers, etc., have a vested interest in creating the idea that city living is "hip" or "in" relative to the suburbs and exburbs. The thinking is, who needs the hassles of ownership (and the costs of a car or to spend all that time commuting; though telecommuting is rapidly growing everywhere).

If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.