A list such as the one provided by RealtyTrac is valuable frontline info; but unless an investor has very deep pockets and can take a few losses mixed in with mostly gains, it's wisest in our view for the investor to really dig into the local-market data and gauge that against the limitations and costs of distance for absentee owners.
Two things not specifically mentioned but more so simply alluded to in that helpful article by Francys Vallecillo, WORLD PROPERTY CHANNEL Global News Center:
1) Management costs (An investor can manage "efficiently and effectively" using local management services but at what cost to the bottom line?)
2) Prospects for the area (The article does say "cities on the list were hard hit by the down turn. Florida has eight markets on the list, the most of any state. But Florida and Las Vegas are among the markets that have seen a strong rebound.")
Do management fees and the local rate of recovery and likelihood for economic sustainability pencil out enough given the particular investor's tolerance for risk?
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.