Provided Bernanke, Et Al., Can't Soothe the Beast Back to Bonds: Mortgage Rate "Surge"…A Comparable Event to Analyze

If not back to bonds:

The Twist/QE3 stimulus aimed right at mortgage and housing was the greatest stimulus of all time by an order of magnitude. And we lost it ALL in a period as quickly as we lost the “Homebuyer Tax Credit”. As such, I don’t see why we should expect something different as an outcome. This, I see similar pressure on house sales volume and prices as we saw in 2010, which kicked off the “double-dip”…of course, that only ended in mid-2011 with the introduction of greatest stimulus of all time…Twist and subsequently QE3.
[..]
I argue that the Twist/QE3 benefit of rates in 2012/13 — mortgage rates 30% lower than in 2011 — was a much more powerful stimulus than the $8k tax credit.

Thus, the immediate loss of this stimulus should produce a similar (or greater) response as we saw from the loss of the $8k tax credit in 2010.

Source: 7-8 Hanson…Mortgage Rate “Surge”…A Comparable Event to Analyze.

Of course, even if Bernanke does convince bond players to get back in, he still will have caused a huge, damaging-for-many "hiccup." It will have been a very expensive way of testing the taper-talk waters. We wouldn't have done it.

However, if we're talking about the very long run in terms of the Fed backing out of all of its Great Recession "investments," that's a completely different subject from the most recent spike over just talk of future tapering.


If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.

Subscribe