News Alerts, Aug. 27, 2013, Evening Edition, 3 New Articles, Real Estate +, Don't Miss Them

Linking doesn't constitute endorsement. Enjoy (share on social networks if you appreciate PropertyPak's efforts):

  1. Marc to Market: Thoughts on the Week Ahead: Pitfalls around the Corner

    If you haven't read Marc Chandler and if you want plenty to contemplate on the current status of global economics and finance, here's an opportunity.

    In recent weeks we have identified four main elements to the investment climate: Speculation about Fed tapering the cyclical recovery in Europe, the stabilization of China and a resumption of capital exports from Japan.

    Marc goes on to discuss those and many, many other points to watch around the world and at home (US) — very impressive, highly recommended.

    Read the source article … ghts-on-week-ahead-pitfalls-around.html

  2. Econbrowser: The geography of success

    Weak U.S. economic growth continues to be discouraging. But it's worth taking a look at a few places where things going well for America.

    There has been a remarkable resurgence in U.S. oil production over the last few years, with levels now back up to where they were in 1992, though still 28% below the peak reached in 1970.

    People go where the jobs are and need housing. Since oil and gas are boom and bust, they often would rather rent. Housing construction (also construction jobs) will follow the oil and gas workers. Buying the land and building the housing to own as a landlord can present problems down the road if the oil or gas reserves will only last a short time. The landlord will end up being stuck without tenants and housing he or she can't sell at a profit. In such cases, especially where jobs will last only a couple of years or so, renting out mobile homes might make more sense, as they can often be relocated to where the jobs go. Be sure to pencil in a sinking fund to cover future anticipated/timed moving costs.

    Read the source article …  /08/the_geography_o_1.html

  3. Why the Fed's bond-buying may not have helped the economy Why the Fed

    When the Fed buys billions of mortgage bonds, the pair finds, other investors who want to hold some amount of the securities have to pay more for them, pushing down the rates on the bonds, and by extension lowering the costs for homebuyers. By the researchers' math, the Fed's first round of QE, back in 2009, lowered 30-year mortage-backed securities yields by 1.07 percentage points; its 2011 efforts to buy more of the securities lowered them 0.23 percent; and the QE3 policy now underway contributed another 0.16 percent.

    "The scarcity . . . generates incentives for banks to originate more loans and relieve the shortage of the current coupon MBS," they write.

    They find similar impacts in terms of lower rates for Treaury [sic] bonds, but they argue that, in contrast to MBS, these haven't helped the real economy.

    We didn't read the cited paper; but, concerning the Washington Post article (quoted), Treasurys are how the government borrows.

    The private sector has been flooded with debt and could not, and still cannot, possibly spend enough to keep the economy going. It has been left to the government (with a much small overall debt) to pick up the slack. Since generally raising taxes during a recession is counter-productive and since raising taxes only on the richest people still would not have been enough and would have been fought against by them tooth and nail, it has been left to the government to borrow, to run larger deficits for a while, to keep the economy from slipping into worse than the Great Depression. Also, there were not enough other buyers to soak up all the Treasurys.

    This is common knowledge amongst most top-tier economist s, though there are Austrian School advocates who are nevertheless against such governmental spending.

    Read the source article … blog/wp/2013/08/23/why-the-feds-bond-buy ing-may-not-have-helped-the-economy/

If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.