News Alerts, Aug. 28, 2013, Evening Edition, 3 New Articles, Real Estate +, Don't Miss Them

Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:

  1. Gaining Efficiency in Real Estate Property Management by Offering Generation-Appropriate Payment Channels | Property Management content from National Real Estate Investor

    In an increasingly competitive rental market, understanding and using tenant demographics and preferences to strategically select payment channel offerings enables real estate property managers to improve their tenant experience as well as save money and enhance accounts receivable management.

    This article reports on how different age groups view both traditional payment methods and emerging payment technology, and how those views influence their rental payment behavior. It also suggests the payment methods — including a number of newer electronic channels — that real estate property managers might want to consider offering based on the generational demographic mix of their tenants.

    Read the source article … http://nreionline.com/property-managemen t/gaining-efficiency-real-estate-propert y-management-offering-generation-appropr ia


  2. Brad DeLong : Josh Bivens: Slow Wage Growth Just One More Sign of How Big a Problem the Profit-Biased Recovery Is: Noted for August 23, 2013

    Because we just couldn't resist:

    … it's better to be arguing over how to fairly split up a big pile of money than to have no big pile of money to split up.

    Read the source article … http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/08/jo sh-bivens-slow-wage-growth-just-one-more -sign-of-how-big-a-problem-the-profit-bi ased-recovery-is-noted-for-august-23-201 .html


  3. The high cost of economic policy uncertainty | WashingtonExaminer.com

    Uncertain about uncertainty?

    Should you invest now or hold off? When pondering that, do you think more about whether the general economy and your local area will see better growth or do you think more about whether the government will, or has, issued new policies and programs/procedures? Perhaps you think about both and more. We hope so.

    America's economic recovery has been slow by historical standards. Growth has been slow, unemployment stubbornly high, and "green shoots" have wilted fast.

    If you listen to some, such as Paul Krugman of the New York Times, the reason for the anemic recovery is that governments at all levels have been "slashing spending in the face of a depressed economy."

    But that's not the reason at all. The evidence points in the opposite direction: that governments have intervened too much, not too little, creating economic uncertainty. This is what's killing the economy.

    Read the source article … http://washingtonexaminer.com/the-high-c ost-of-economic-policy-uncertainty/artic le/2534314

    We don't think it's an either/or here. We think there's merit in the idea that fiscal slashes and uncertainty both contribute to slow, or no, growth or even recession or depression. We won't write a long essay on that here but will simply point out the following and let you draw your own conclusion concerning uncertainty alone as the cause of slow growth right now.

    Another month, another dive in the Stanford/University of Chicago Economic Policy Uncertainty Index. It's now down to its lowest level since 2008.

    The index seeks to measure the effect of policy uncertainty, including pending regulations and expiring tax provisions, on the economy. As you may have heard once or twice over the last few years, many conservatives blame uncertainty for holding back hiring and growth in this recovery. Those lawmak ers love to cite this index as proof of elevated uncertainty.

    According to the index, the decline of uncertainty this year is clear*.

    Read the source article … http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonk blog/wp/2013/08/05/uncertainty-isnt-a-pr oblem-anymore/

    There's also this, to which we've linked before:

    There are widespread claims that firms are cutting hours worked and converting full time jobs into part time jobs because of Obama-care.

    So what does the data say. Below is a table of unpublished data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of part time employment by private and government employers. The government data includes state, local and federal part time workers but I have also broken out federal part time workers in a separate column. The data also is not seasonally adjusted, so generally month to month comparisons are meaningless and one should make comparisons between a month in 2013 and the same month in 2012.

    The data shows that private part time employment in 2013 is lower in every month but one than it was in the same month of 2012. Moreover, federal part time employment was just the opposite, rising in every month but January. In particular, in June and July, 2013, when firms were supposedly cutting hours worked to avoid having to pay for employee health insurance over 100% of the increase in part time employment stemmed from federal government employment. This in turn was generated by employee furloughs brought about by the sequestration.

    Read the source article … http://angrybearblog.com/2013/08/obamaca rethe-sequester-and-part-time-employment .html


If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.

Subscribe