Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:
- We're All Still Hostages to the Big Banks – NYTimes.com
A scathing view of the current practices of Wall Street banks and their regulators by Anat R. Admati, "a professor of finance and economics at the Stanford Graduate School of Business":
STANFORD, Calif. — NEARLY five years after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers touched off a global financial crisis, we are no safer. Huge, complex and opaque banks continue to take enormous risks that endanger the economy. From Washington to Berlin, banking lobbyists have blocked essential reforms at every turn. Their efforts at obfuscation and influence-buying are no surprise. What's shameful is how easily our leaders have caved in, and how quickly the lessons of the crisis have been forgotten.
Bankers and regulators want us to believe that the banks' high levels of borrowing are acceptable because banks are good at managing their risks and regulators know how to measure them. The failures of both were manifest in 2008, and yet regulators have ignored the lessons.
What do you think? Are the banks still being under-regulated?
Read the source article … http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/26/opinio n/were-all-still-hostages-to-the-big-ban ks.html?pagewanted=all
- Home builders may need to lower prices, Dutta says: Bloomberg (Video) – Milwaukee – The Business Journal
Some of this was even beginning before Ben Bernanke raised "tapering."
Aug. 23 (Bloomberg) — Neil Dutta, head U.S. economist at Renaissance Macro Research LLC, talks about U.S. home sales data released today. Sales of newly built homes declined 13.4 percent to a 394,000 annualized pace, the weakest since October, Commerce Department reported from Washington. Dutta speaks with Erik Schatzker and Stephanie Ruhle on Bloomberg Television's "Market Makers." (Source: Bloomberg)
Read the source article … http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/mor ning_roundup/2013/08/home-builders-may-n eed-to-lower.html
- Germany's Eurozone Policy Is Completely Incoherent by Christopher T. Mahoney – Project Syndicate
Funny but, unfortunately, quite possibly true, from Christopher T. Mahoney:
4. Germany has no idea what it really wants.
I vote for #4.
We are in the middle of the German parliamentary election, and no country is coherent during an election.
The tragedy is that all of this could be easily and instantly cured with massive deficit monetization and 5% inflation evenly spread throughout the zone.
Bernanke in 2002:
"Deflation is in almost all cases a side effect of a collapse of aggregate demand–a drop in spending so severe that producers must cut prices on an ongoing basis in order to find buyers. Likewise, the economic effects of a deflationary episode are similar to those of any other sharp decline in aggregate spending–namely, recession, rising unemployment, and financial stress."
We couldn't agree more with Ben Bernanke's statement there.
However, Germans associate "massive deficit monetization" with near-certain hyper-inflation. The truth though is that as one may readily see by the Fed's efforts, creating inflation really takes a truly massive dose, much larger than the Fed has been able to inject and get moving in the real economy. Of course, "deficit" refers to fiscal spending (governmental), which is not what the Fed does but rather has wanted government to do more.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.