News Alerts, Sept. 4, 2013, Morning Edition, 5 New Articles, Real Estate +, Don't Miss Them

Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:

  1. Housing fix has strong enemies – latimes.com

    We've covered both sides of the Richmond, California eminent-domain controversy. Here's the most aggressive pro-Richmond plan piece we've seen in the mainstream press.

    The federal government and the banking industry have failed to bring mortgage relief to homeowners in need. Richmond's plan to use eminent domain would help fill the void.

    By Michael Hiltzik. August 30, 2013, 7:17 p.m.

    One way to judge the virtues of the city of Richmond's initiative to use eminent domain to help its strapped mortgage borrowers is by the hysterical reaction of the banks and investors holding the mortgage loans.

    Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of New York have sued the East Bay city in federal court to throttle the plan even before its birth. (A court hearing on their request for an injunction is set for Sept. 13.)

    They've enlisted federal regulators in their hand-wringing over the damage little Richmond (pop. 105,000) might wreak on the mortgage market nationwide. The real estate interests have even cajoled some of their housebroken congressmen, such as John Campbell (R-Irvine), into introducing legislation to stop Richmond in its tracks.

    Michael goes on to describe why he thinks the Richmond plan is good and fair, etc.

    He writes, "… with the help of the San Francisco investment firm Mortgage Resolution Partners, the mortgages would be extinguished and refinanced so their balances would come to about 95% of the homes' current market value, on average."

    Just to be clear, the Richmond deal would be an exclusive for "Mortgage Resolution Partners," which firm would stand to make huge sums if the deal were to be duplicated around the nation.

    If a city is going to do this plan, shouldn't it let the contract out for bid to qualified bidders?

    Read the source article … http://www.latimes.com/business/realesta te/la- fi-hiltzik-20130901,0,627924,full.column


  2. Mortgages will remain hard to get until common sense returns | Inman News

    By Lou Barnes. Contributor. Aug 30, 2013

    …six years after mortgage misbehavior stopped cold, we still do not have a national understanding of what happened, laboring in ignorance, score-settling, and the entirely successful effort by Wall Street investment bankers to dodge accountability.

    1. Pre-bubble, every mortgage bank and broker was contractually obliged to repurchase any loan with deficient underwriting, whether it defaulted or not.

    How many of them went bankrupt and unable to repurchase loans? Isn't that what skin in the game is designed to help prevent: moral hazard?

    Read the source article …


  3. Related Group plans 4 more towers – Business – MiamiHerald.com

    Is it a bubble forming, or is this time different?

    Posted on Friday, 08.23.13. By Martha Brannigan

    In Miami and Miami Beach, Related alone already has under construction four condominium projects with 924 units and four others with 1,349 units in the works, according to company data. Thousands of units are going up in Miami as a phalanx of other developers also rush to attract wealthy Latin American investors willing to make hefty deposits and pay steep prices on pre-construction condominiums.

    With the pace of condo development hitting high gear, some experts wonder how much is too much.

    "The question now becomes: 'Is Related going to overbuild the market this decade like they did last decade?' " said Jack McCabe, an independent housing analyst and CEO of McCabe Research & Consulting Inc. in Deerfield Beach.

    Related and other developers insist that the substantial deposits required from buyers distinguishes this cycle from the fateful bubble that wrecked South Florida's economy. More skin in the game keeps speculators out and ensures more measured development, the argument goes.

    Read the source article … http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/23/35 81968/related-group-plans-4-more-towers. html


  4. Calculated Risk: Fannie Mae: Mortgage Serious Delinquency rate declined in July, Lowest since December 2008

    By Bill McBride on 8/30/2013 04:14:00 PM

    The Fannie Mae serious delinquency rate has fallen 0.8 percentage points over the last year, and at that pace the serious delinquency rate will be under 1% in just under 2 years. Note: The "normal" serious delinquency rate is under 1%.

    Read the source article …


  5. Why India's Economy Is Stumbling – NYTimes.com

    By Arvind Subramanian ["a senior fellow at both the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the Center for Global Development, is the author of "Eclipse: Living in the Shadow of China's Economic Dominance."]

    The current government, which took office in 2004, has made two fundamental errors. First, it assumed that growth was on autopilot and failed to address serious structural problems. Second, flush with revenues, it began major redistribution programs, neglecting their consequences: higher fiscal and trade deficits.

    Published: August 30, 2013

    Structural problems were inherent in India's unusual model of economic development, which relied on a limited pool of skilled labor rather than an abundant supply of cheap, unskilled, semiliterate labor. This meant that India specialized in call centers, writing software for European companies and providing back-office services for American health insurers and law firms and the like, rather than in a manufacturing model. Other economies that have developed successfully — Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea and China — relied in their early years on manufacturing, which provided more jobs for the poor.

    Just think if India had done what it did in the service and software sectors but had also focused upon basic manufacturing to employ the poorest. Will they do it now?

    Read the source article … http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/31/opinio n/why-indias-economy-is-stumbling.html?_ r=0


If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.

Subscribe