News Alerts, Sept. 13, 2013, Morning Edition, #RealEstate +

Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:

  1. BBC News – The trouble with Chinese data

    This problem is understated.

    In June, China's customs administration cracked down on false trade invoices that disguised money flows designed to get around capital controls.

    It ended up reducing China's trade figures.

    Now, 28 companies in Luliang county in Yunnan province have reported industrial output that was more than double what their actual production was last year.

    According to Xinhua, the companies defended themselves and said that local officials had induced them to do so in exchange for loans from state-owned banks.


    In any case, these are hardly new complaints about the accuracy of Chinese statistics.

    Before becoming premier, Li Keqiang had questioned the reliability of Chinese GDP. He was reported to have said to look instead at three direct indicators of economic activity: cargo volume on railways, electricity consumption, and bank loans.

    The recent wave of action fits with the overall push by the new Chinese leaders to crack down on fraud and corruption. For Premier Li, it is an attempt to increase confidence in the Chinese economy.

    Read the source article … 997

  2. Global and euro imbalances: China and Germany

    We analyse global and euro area imbalances by focusing on China and Germany as large surplus and creditor countries. In the 2000s, domestic reforms in both countries expanded the effective labour force, restrained wages, shifted income towards profits and increased corporate saving. As a result, both economies' current account surpluses widened before the global financial crisis, and that of Germany has proven more persistent as domestic investment has remained subdued.

    Read the source article …

  3. BBC News – China says Yunnan county 'faked' economic data

    This reflects fundamental dishonesty at the local governmental level and within the private sector. Ethics has been severely under stressed during the economic-privatization phase of China's "revolution."

    Read the source article … 472

  4. Testosterone Pit – Home – Bonds Bleed: Largest Bubble In History Unwinds, But The "Great Rotation" Into Stocks Is Deceptive Wall Street Hype

    The following is why we think the Fed should not taper any time soon.

    Asset values cannot be inflated forever. Something has to give. Now bonds are sliding, taking down bond funds with them, and our antsy investors are dumping their shares, and bond funds are forced to sell more bonds just when other investors are reluctant to jump into the fray to buy them, and just when the Fed is contemplating pulling up its stakes too, and prices slide further. The giddy "wealth effect" that the Fed printed into existence evaporates, and people end up poorer, not only by the money that they thought they had and that they then spent, but also by the amount that their investments declined in value.

    It should also be pointed out that Ben Bernanke called upon the Congress to up fiscal spending rather than relying upon the Fed to ramp up the economy single-handedly. Rather than doing that, the Congress did the sequester and increased the payroll tax (backwards acts during a recession).

    Read the source article …  /9/5/bonds-bleed-largest-bubble-in-hist ory-unwinds-but-the-great.html

  5. Household formation lags, could impede a 'sustained recovery' | Inman News

    The rate of household formation is dropping, a trend that might hamper a "sustained recovery," according to an analysis from the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies using U.S. Census data. Estimates for household formation in 2012 were revised downward 12.5 percent to 857,000, and the trend through the second quarter of 2013 suggests that households are forming at an even lower rate of 746,000 per year.

    It's a vicious cycle. The lack of formation harms the economy, and the down economy hampers formation.

    Read the source article … ation-slags-possibly-preventing-a-sustai ned-recovery/

If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.