News Alerts, Sept. 17, 2013, Evening Edition, #RealEstate +

Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:

  1. Japan Leads Charge in Asian Commercial Property – Wall Street Journal – WSJ.com

    The bulk of the increase was in Japan, where aggressive monetary stimulus has stoked the economy and generated confidence that the country might finally win its long battle with deflation. Investment in Japanese commercial real estate totaled US$20.8 billion in the first half, up 50% from a year earlier. Of that, US$19 billion came from Japanese investors, including US$10.9 billion from real-estate investment trusts that began buying late last year following the election of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

    Can Japan keep it up? Will a sales-tax hike derail their progress? Can they overcome the demographic problems of an aging population not being replaced with a high enough birth and/or immigration rate?

    Read the source article … http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headl ines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-321357/


  2. Cash for Homes: Policy Implications of an Investor-Led Housing Recovery | RISMedia

    … irresponsible investors can…destroy them [communities] by allowing properties to sit empty, declining to bring rental properties up to code, and neglecting tenants' needs in instances where the home is occupied. Additionally, investors that buy large quantities of properties in a single area can cause prices to overheat and increase market volatility. Conversely, if institutional investors following a set business plan sell numerous properties in the same time frame, prices in those neighborhoods could decline again.

    Deutsche Bank may soon begin selling securities backed by rental payments from properties owned by institutional investors. Such an innovation will propel this industry's growth even more.

    Institutional investors such as the Blackstone Group L.P. are also working with financial institutions to create new securities based on rental payments from investor-owned homes. If the market for these securities grows, institutional investors will be able to access more capital and buy more properties to convert to rental homes, which would fuel demand for investor-owned homes and may make it more lucrative for a mortgage holder to sell or foreclose on homeowners rather than keep them in their homes. These transactions would occur outside the reach of a regulatory structure that oversees mortgages, not cash purchases.

    The cheaper the money, the more profit even in a tight market. So, don't count the institutional investors out quite yet.

    Read the source article … http://rismedia.com/2013-09-09/cash-for- homes-policy-implications-of-an-investor -led-housing-recovery/


  3. South Delhi's property prices down by 20-35%, Defence Colony and Vasant Vihar worst hit – Economic Times

    India's real estate collapsing:

    NEW DELHI: Prices of homes in upscale South Delhi have dropped by 20 per cent-35 per cent over the last one year, with developers and cash-strapped investors offering big discounts to dispose off their assets in a slowing economy.

    Till about six months ago, discounts on new homes in the area were being offering only by developers facing oversupply. But with the economic situation worsening, this category of sellers has expanded to include cash-strapped investors and businessmen who are keen to sell the high-end apartments they had picked up some years ago.

    "Some people over leveraged themselves by buy multiple properties when the going was good. Now with the market slowing down, they are looking at exiting but are unable to find buyers," said Sunil Bhandari, managing director of Royale Realtors India. "They have no option but to reduce their price expectations, hence profits."

    Read the source article … http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes .com/2013-09-10/news/41937957_1_south-de lhi-defence-colony-crore


  4. Chinese homebuyers emerging – Bankrate, Inc.

    Most Chinese homebuyers are using cash to pay for expensive homes in the United States.

    According to the National Association of Realtors, Chinese buyers made up 12 percent of the market of foreign homebuyers in the 12 months ending March 31. They shelled out a median $425,000, compared with the median of nearly $276,000 spent by other foreign homebuyers. Close to 70 percent of the transactions by Chinese buyers were all-cash.

    Read the source article … http://www.bankrate.com/financing/mortga ges/chinese-homebuyers-emerging/


  5. Dubai House Prices World-Beating, but Bubble Talk Grows – Middle East Real Time – WSJ

    Jonathan Morris, Standard Chartered's U.A.E. chief executive, said recently that everything looked fine at the moment. "Are we seeing an asset bubble in house prices?" he said. "The answer is today: no. We're seeing a normal pricing dynamic happening. What we have is a demand-led price increase, demand-led because of the stronger growth, stronger jobs market here. The job market here is very strong at the moment so people are buying houses to live in, creating personal wealth, and that is a good thing."

    Is this time really different? An added layer of regulation does alter the landscape somewhat, of course, and the feverish pitch of the earlier bubble arguably hasn't yet been reached. Only time will tell.

    Read the source article … http://blogs.wsj.com/middleeast/2013/09/ 10/dubai-house-prices-world-beating-but- bubble-talk-grows/


If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.

Subscribe