News Alerts. Sept. 27, 2013. Morning Edition. #RealEstate

Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:

  1. Resident Retention: A Turn Costs What? Part 1 – Multifamily Blogs

    Food for thought and action from Jen Piccotti:

    Turnover. We're always going to have it. In some cases, turnover is good: saying goodbye to a delinquent or unruly resident who sucks up valuable staff time and resources. Some cases are uncontrollable: a resident is relocating to a new city or state, or they are buying a home. But most turnover is not only bad but something you can directly control.

    Let's break that statement down.

    "Most turnover is bad."

    In the 2012 NAA Survey of Operating Income and Expense, the average national turnover rate was 54%. This number has remained fairly consistent over the past several years, but the bottom line for our industry is that on average a community has to replace half of its customers every year.

    Traditionally, our industry has accepted this with the thought that the units can always be leased again at a higher rate. A higher rental rate equals more income, right? Wrong. Here's why:

    Read the source article … http://www.multifamilyinsiders.com/multi family-blogs/resident-retention-a-turn-c osts-what-part-1


  2. Freddie Mac Failed To Pursue Defaulters For Recovery of Up To $4.6B

    Freddie Mac failed to refer nearly 58,000 foreclosed mortgages with about $4.6 billion in shortfalls to vendors who assess borrowers' ability to repay and are responsible to collect mortgage payments, thus foregoing a chance to recover dues from homeowners who had the ability to repay, according to an audit report from the Federal Housing Finance Agency's Office of Inspector General, or OIG, in Washington.

    Read the source article … http://www.ibtimes.com/freddie-mac-faile d-pursue-defaulters-recovery-46b-shortfa lls-foreclosed-mortgage-properties-14106 12


  3. Top 10 Apartment Markets Over the Past Five Years [Video] | Property Management Insider

    In part one of this special series, MPF Research examined the so-called "Sexy Six" markets favored by many investors and whether or not they lived up to their billing over the past five years.

    Editor's Note: MPF is measuring revenue change based on today's effective rents for new leases vs. prices charged five years ago as well as looking at the change in occupancy numbers over the same period of time.

    Read the source article … http://www.propertymanagementinsider.com  /top-10-apartment-markets-past-five-yea rs.html


  4. Are You Obligated to Disclose Previous Meth Contamination on Your Property?

    Very important:

    By Elizabeth Whited … Meth labs have been found in some pretty strange places. To name a few: college campuses, hotel rooms, vehicles, and even inside a nursing home. But the most common, and logical (if setting up a meth lab anywhere could be considered logical) place is in a rental property, or home. After all of the cleanup, and the extensive procedures to take care of a previous meth lab on a property, is it still necessary to inform new renters, or potential buyers?

    The answer, of course depends on the state. The Scripps Howard News Service conducted a search for states that require meth contamination disclosure to potential home buyers, and tenants. They found that only a little over half of the states in America require disclosure (with varying laws).

    Read the source article … https://www.therrd.com/main/?p=3752


If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.

Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.

Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.

Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.

Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.

We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.

If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.

The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?

For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.

We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.

We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.

Subscribe