Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:
- Treasury moves to penalise exploitation of offshore mansion tax loophole | Business | The Guardian
The Treasury says the government is moving to clamp down on businesses that try to promote aggressive tax avoidance.
The super-rich who own mansions through offshore companies face new rules forcing them to declare if they are trying to avoid tax, a Treasury minister will announce.
Ministers are planning to close a loophole with immediate effect, amid fears wealthy property owners are already trying to find ways round a new annual levy of up to £140,000 on houses owned through companies.
Many properties in London's most exclusive developments are owned through companies. Around the time changes were announced, an analysis of apartment owners in the One Hyde Park development showed 50 out of 56 properties sold for a combined total of £1.1bn were owned by offshore companies. Some were based in the British Virgin Islands, the Isle of Man and Guernsey.
The cheating doesn't hit legitimate landlords more than others, but it does drive up costs for everyone playing by the legal rules.
- Talk of apartment bubble is premature – Atlanta Business Chronicle
Cranes are popping up weekly on Atlanta's skyline as developers rush to build new apartments.
Any discussion of an apartment bubble is premature based on current market conditions. The occupancy rate is high, rents are rising, and metro Atlanta's economy is adding jobs. Developments that have delivered early in this cycle are performing well, often exceeding original underwriting projections. Market conditions, however, will inevitably soften as more projects in the pipeline are delivered. A slowdown in rent growth, rising construction costs, and an upward movement in capitalization rates are all threats that could erode developer profit margins.
- Cities Turn To Land Banks in Effort to Fight Urban Plight – Auction.com
This is an excellent overview.
The NY times recently wrote an article discussing Philadelphia's plan to vote this fall on establishing a "land bank" purposed to "encourage buyers who are committed to making improvements, instead of speculators, to acquire tax delinquent properties." A land bank is a quasi-government agency purposed with collecting vacant, foreclosed or underused properties and then redistributing them to developers with the experience, funding and plans to help revitalize neighborhoods that have fallen on tough times. This vacant stock is an overhang on local property values, lead to crime, and can torpedo a local economy. The land banks allow cities to control the revitalization by placing properties in the hands of developers that hold a similar vision to the city and remove as much vacant space from the market as possible.
- LLC Tax Election For Real Estate Investors
To make an LLC tax election the owner simply must file the appropriate papers with the IRS. What's the bottom line? The LLC owner can choose how the LLC is taxed.
LLC Asset Protection
No matter what LLC tax election is picked, the LLC will have the same asset protection strength, and will operate the same. There is no such thing as a limited liability partnership, or a limited liability corporation. There is only a limited liability company taxed as either a partnership or corporation. An important thing to remember is that your little company is your best tax saver.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.