Linking ≠ endorsement. Enjoy and share:
- Mega banks tap loan-loss reserves | REwired
Federal regulators warned banks to remain cautious about padding profits with money set aside to cover soured loans, but some of the biggest institutions did much more of that in the third quarter when compared to earlier this year.
The nation's largest banks by assets — including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC) and Bank of America (BAC) — recorded nearly $5 billion in loan-loss reserves in the third quarter, up by roughly a third from both the second quarter and year-ago adjustments, according to the Wall Street Journal.
The move comes during a time when banks are being slammed by revenue slowdowns, thanks to plunging mortgage lending and trading activity.
- Accuracy of Canada's housing data under scrutiny – The Globe and Mail
Canada's surprisingly strong real estate market is leading to heightened scrutiny of the data used to assess sales.
CREA [Canadian Real Estate Association] does not revise its numbers each month, but rather on a schedule that it says minimizes distortions to comparisons. "It may be argued that TREB's [Toronto Real Estate Board] methodology produces a more accurate picture of history once all revisions have been incorporated, and it may also be argued that CREA's methodology produces more historically comparable statistics for the current month being reported on," Mr. Klump [CREA chief economist Gregory Klump] said.
- MBA urges FHA to adopt QM safe harbor | 2013-10-25 | HousingWire
The Mortgage Bankers Association sent a letter to the Federal Housing Administration Friday, asking the agency to treat all FHA-insured loans as Qualified Mortgages with the heightened safe-harbor legal standard attached.
"MBA strongly believes that if the HUD QM rule is finalized correctly, it will foster sound and sustainable FHA-insured mortgage financing for consumers," explained MBA senior vice president of public policy and industry relations Stephen O'Connor.
- A return of speculative industrial development | Jones Lang LaSalle EMEA Research Blog
… with a few 'big box' units now under construction and a pick-up in development of smaller units this points to a sign that not only confidence but market fundamentals have improved.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.