Linking ≠ endorsement.
↑ [Recommended] Coppola Comment: Marginally confusing
Helicopter drops or fiscal easing that targeted the poor would be a more effective stimulus than QE. Even if people used the money to pay off debt it would STILL be a more effective stimulus than putting yet more money in the hands of those who already have more than they know what to do with. I refuse to accept that distributional matters are of no consequence.
↑ More Markets Slowly Inch Toward 'Normal' | Realtor Magazine
About 16 percent of 350 metro areas tracked nationwide have returned or exceeded their last normal levels of economic and housing activity, according to the latest National Association of Home Builders/First American Leading Markets Index. Year-over-year, the index has gained seven markets.
↑ How 11 Rental Properties Have Increased My Net Worth By $600,000 in 3.5 Years | Invest Four More
We like reading Mark Ferguson because he doesn't hype his stories and remains reasonably transparent.
I also have been lucky that prices have increased significantly in Northern Colorado in the last few years. I would say lucky for the sake of calculating net worth, but the increase in prices have made it harder to buy cheap rental properties with great cash flow.
↑ Sober Look: Dodd-Frank creates a drag on residential mortgage growth
Staying with the theme of credit expansion, one area where growth has been more constrained lately is residential mortgage lending. And one potential culprit seems to be the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Standards Under the Truth in Lending Act (ATR/QM rule). These rules are part of the Dodd-Frank Act. …
The ATR/QM rule has certainly not helped the housing market and may have created a drag on the US GDP. Welcome to the world of unintended consequences.
We differ a bit. We don't think they were unintended. Higher standards definitely preclude some borrowers who would otherwise receive loans. The point was and remains to keep a bubble from forming and bursting again.
Also, a lack of purchase money mortgages is at least partially off set by renting and new-apartment construction.
A higher standard isn't the problem. We need good-paying jobs even to rent.
↑ [Recommended] Writer Nomi Prins | Interviews | Tavis Smiley | PBS
From TR until Reagan (?), Nomi Prins says her research at the various presidential libraries indicates that the banking dynasties collaborated with the Presidents in ways to regulate the banking industry.
The writer and Wall Street veteran examines the genealogy of American power, about which she writes in her latest text, All the Presidents' Bankers.
Nomi Prins left a 10-year career on Wall Street—with posts at Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns in London and Lehman Brothers—to write about politics, money and relationships. Her articles have appeared in The New York Times, Fortune, The Guardian, The Nation and other publications, and her books include nonfiction, including Other People's Money, which predicted the financial crisis, and the historical novel, Black Tuesday. In her latest text, All the Presidents' Bankers, she gives an account of the hundred-year interdependence between the White House and Wall Street. Prins is also a senior fellow at Demos, a nonpartisan public policy research and advocacy organization.
↑ Libertarian Fantasies – NYTimes.com
…notion rests on the belief that the welfare state is a crazily complicated mess of inefficient programs, and that simplification would save enough money to pay for universal grants that are neither means-tested nor conditional on misfortune. But the reality is nothing like that. The great bulk of welfare-state spending comes from a handful of major programs, and these programs are fairly efficient, with low administrative costs.
Actually, the cost of bureaucracy is in general vastly overestimated. Compensation of workers accounts for only around 6 percent of non defense federal spending, and only a fraction of that compensation goes to people you could reasonably call bureaucrats.
↑ [Highly recommended] When She Talks, Banks Shudder – NYTimes.com
We like very much the way Anat R. Admati thinks about banking. Binyamin Appelbaum:
Ms. Admati's simple message is that the government is overlooking the best way to strengthen the financial system. Regulators, she says, need to worry less about what banks do with their money, and more about where the money comes from.
Companies other than banks get money mostly by selling shares to investors or by reinvesting profits. Banks, by contrast, can rely almost entirely on borrowed funds, including the money they get from depositors. Ms. Admati argues that banks are taking larger risks than other kinds of companies because they use other people's money, and the results are that they keep crashing the economy.
Her solution is to make banks behave more like other companies by forcing them to reduce sharply their reliance on borrowed money. That would likely make the banking industry more stodgy and less profitable — reducing the economic risks, the executive bonuses and, for shareholders, both the risks and the profits.
↑ The Fed's Vice Chair Still Doesn't Know About the Housing Bubble | Beat the Press
Residential construction has recovered to some extent, but it is still well below its bubble peaks. Unless we see another bubble, there is no reason to expect construction to get back anywhere near its 2005-2006 share of GDP. Consumption has also recovered to some extent, but without the bubble wealth that drove it, there is no reason to expect it to reach the same share of output as in the bubble years.
↑ Why Australia has one of the world's largest housing bubbles | Who crashed the economy?
Wow! Just wow.
…if you think letting people steal money from their financial futures in order to buy houses today which they really can't afford is going to make real estate more affordable, you've been spending too many evenings with the goat. The opposite is probable. In Canada, it's fact.
So maybe Xenophon just made an honest mistake and didn't do thorough homework before proposing this idea?
Aussie Politicians and their $300 Million Property Portfolio
Earlier this week, research surfaced on our politicians and their sizeable investment portfolios. In an article titled The Propertied Federal Political Class, the authors write:
The public should ask "Are the property holdings of our federal politicians negatively influencing policy and causing them to ignore evidence?"
It's a very good question.
Their comprehensive research show 226 members in both houses of parliament with an ownership stake in a total of 563 properties — an average of 2.5 properties per member.
The news spread like a virus, with Fairfax later picking up the story, The many houses of Parliament: property-rich pollies 'have vested interest' in high prices
Oh and Xenophon I hear you ask? He owns just eight….
↑ Blame for blighted properties in Monessen reaches across globe | TribLIVE
Hersh isn't sure why people from another country invest in these properties.
"We have tried to answer that question," she said. "We've heard that they are eBay transactions and simply have no idea what they're buying. They really don't understand the local market and think they're making a good investment."
Court Gould, executive director of Sustainable Pittsburgh, said the spread of absentee owners is a sign of the times.
"Clearly, we're in a time of a global economy, and now real estate is a global commodity," he said. "That's not necessarily a sign that people are investing in property because they think there's going to be a turnaround."
Mandarino doubts that most foreign owners have ever seen their properties in person.
"I've asked people, how did you find Monessen?" said Mandarino. "They said eBay. I asked an Indian gentleman once and he said he just typed 'cheapest homes in United States' in Google, and that's how he found Monessen."
↑ Li Ka-shing, Wang Jianlin And China's Falling Home Prices
Two of the men who have made the most money playing China's real estate market over the last two decades hedged their bets in recent days, as Li Ka-shing and Wang Jianlin diversified their investments away from the country's property sector.
Although recent data does not support the notion of China's real estate market being a bubble waiting to pop….
We see the data differently.
↑ Southwest braces as Lake Mead water levels drop – San Francisco Chronicle
Federal officials and water administrators in metro areas such as Las Vegas and Phoenix say they're committed to finding new ways to make every drop of river water count — from cloud seeding to pipelines to new reservoirs to desalination plants.
They've been dragging their feet on desalination for decades. If they had started building when they should have, there'd be plenty of water right now.
↑ EPI and AEI Agree: Cutting Jobless Benefits Did Not Boost Employment | Economic Policy Institute
For economics to be taken seriously as a social science, its practitioners, no matter their political outlook, should be able to look at the same unambiguous data and reach the same conclusion. That is exactly what has happened in this case, with scholars from AEI and EPI agreeing that paring back jobless benefits did not have a positive labor market effect. If only Congress could get the memo.
We'd rather Congress fund employment and high-skills training.
↑ Long Mired in Slow Growth, Indy's Apartment Market Sees Big Gains in Q2 – YouTube
Across the country, the apartment sector posted very strong revenue growth fueled by robust demand in 2014's 2nd quarter. The boom extended period the usual hotspots, reaching even Indianapolis — a slow-growth market that hadn't seen much momentum prior to Q2.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.