These statements by VP Biden largely substantiate my post of August 23, 2016: "Global-Risk Management: Distorted Geopolitical Analysis by Fort Russ News Editorial Team on US-YPG Connection."
The Obama administration is sending a strong signal to the world that it does not back the YPG's ideological positions but is rather only using the YPG to fight IS.
In saying what he did, Biden made clear that official US policy is to keep the YPG from fomenting direct US-Russian fighting in the area. The YPG must be called back from hitting Assad's forces, not just that the US is appeasing Erdogan. By not being able to engage Assad, the YPG won't be able to cause the US to protect the YPG against Assad's forces backed by Russian air power.
Of course, the YPG does not take marching orders from the US and will do what it wants with or without the US.
What the US will have to do is back the YPG only in its direct anti-IS fighting. The US will have to stay far enough back so that when the YPG fights the Syrian military, US advisors and ground forces will not be hit by the Syrian military or the Russians.
It is highly likely, however, that Putin would not send Russian planes to attack the YPG.
This does not give Erdogan a free hand. Erdogan has the juggling of a lifetime on his hands, a situation he brought upon himself. He should have made peace with the Kurds long ago. He should have worked with Assad against al Qaeda right from the get go. It's still not too late, but he's not very bright.
If you are an investor in 1-4 unit properties in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, or Washington, please do the financially responsible thing and make sure you have proper Landlord Insurance with PropertyPak™. We love focusing on real estate and the economy in general, but we are also here to serve your insurance needs.
Hill & Usher (PropertyPak™ is a division) has many insurance offerings. See our menu above for more info and links.
Did this post help you? Let us know by leaving your comment below.
Note: This blog does not provide legal, financial, or accounting advice. Seek professional counsel.
Furthermore, we, as insurance producers, are prohibited by law from disparaging the insurance industry, carriers, other producers, etc. With that in mind, we provide links without staking out positions that violate the law. We provide them solely from a public-policy standpoint wherein we encourage our industry to be sure our profits, etc., are fair and balanced.
We do not necessarily fact checked the contents of every linked article or page, etc.
If we were to conclude any part or parts of our industry are in violation of fundamental fairness and the legal standards of a state or states, we'd address the issue through proper, legal channels. We trust you understand.
The laws that tie our tongues, so to speak, are designed to keep the public from losing confidence in the industry and the regulatory system overseeing it. Insurance commissioners around the country work very hard to analyze rates and to not allow the industry to be damaged by bad rate-settings and changes in coverages. The proper way for people in the industry to deal with such matters is by adhering to the laws, rules, and regulations of the applicable states and within industry associations where such matters may be discussed in private without giving the industry unnecessary black eyes. Ethics is very high on the list in the insurance industry, and we don't want to lose the people's trust. That said, the industry is not perfect; but what industry is?
For our part, we believe in strong regulations and strong regulators.
We welcome your comments and ask you to keep in mind that we cannot and will not reply in any way or ways where any insurance commissioner could rightly say we've violated the law of the given state.
We are allowed to share rating-bureau data/reports and industry-consultant opinions but make clear here that those opinions are theirs and do not necessarily reflect our position.